• Function
  • Performance
  • Productivity

INTRODUCTION

Poultry are unable to synthesize L-arginine (Arg) due to the lack of almost all the enzymes involved in the urea cycle (Khajali and Wideman, 2010). This imperfection in birds physiology keeps Arg as one of the most crucial and essential amino acids (AAs) in poultry. Therefore, it is important to meet the Arg requirements in the birds through dietary supplementation to achieve the maximum performance.

The constant progress in breeding value of poultry changes the genetic potential of birds. An update about the nutrient requirements of the recent genetics of the laying hens is being ignored. Same is applies to the Arg requirements of the laying hens. There is reasonable amount of literature available about the Arg requirement in broilers, however, there is not enough studies on the requirement of Arg in laying hens. Currently, NRC 1994 recommends 700 mg of Arg/hen/day, Brazilian tables recommends 806 mg/hen/day, Lohmann recommends 830 mg Arg/hen/day at the feed intake of 110g/d, whereas, Hy-Line recommends 856 mg/hen/day.

 

 

Laying performance

Increasing Arg in diets seem to have a positive effect on laying rate (Silva et al., 2012). Arg inclusion in diets higher than NRC recommendation caused better results. With Arg inclusion rates at 0, 200, 400 and 600 mg/kg, a dietary digestible Arg level of 0.943%, 1.093%, 1.243%, 1.393%, and 1.543% was achieved. At 1.262% of dArg, the highest egg production was obtained. An increase in dietary Arg by 2% and 4% (0.714% and 0.728%, respectively) above NRC recommendations (0.70%) in diet of layers had positive effects on egg production and egg mass with at least 6% of extra production as compared with the control (based on NRC) (Youssef et al., 2015). Likewise, L-Arg supplementation to broiler breeder hens (60 week of age, 210 Arbor Acres female broiler breeders) by 0, 2000, 4000, 6000, and 8000 mg/kg, contributing to 0.96%, 1.16%, 1.36%, 1.56%, and 1.76% dArg, respectively, resulted in highest laying rate at 1.36% dArg level (Duan et al., 2015).

In a recent study (Leiboldt et al., 2016), different genotype (GT): two white (WLA and R11, high and low performing GTs, respectively) and two brown (BLA and L68, high and low performing GTs, respectively) layers were considered. Authors hypothesized that high performing genotypes (HPGTs) and low performing genotypes (LPGTs) will perform differently with L-Arg level of 70% of NRC as low Arg (LA), 100% as adequate arginine (AA) and 200% as high arginine (HA). GT has effect on laying parameters. The laying intensity did not differ between HPGTs, whereas LPGTs. In general, the deficient Arg group (LA) showed lower laying intensity than AA and HA (p < 0.05). Egg weight was influenced by GT, diet and Age as well as their interactions (p<0.001). Brown eggs were heavier than white eggs. HPGTs laid heavier eggs than LPGTs until week 33 (p<0.001). Daily egg mass (DEM) was affected by GT, diet, age and interaction of GTs and age. In general, deficit group showed lowest DEM among all GTs. Yolk proportion was affected significantly by GT, diet, age and interaction between GT and diet, GT and age. HPGT eggs contained lower yolk proportion than LPGT eggs (p<0.001). Egg shell proportion was affected by GT and age also by interaction between GT and diet, GT and Age, GT and diet and age (p<0.001). White eggs had higher shell proportion than brown eggs.

In conclusion, high level of Arg have a positive effect on secretion of luteinizing hormone (LH). LH acts directly on the ovary and follicles. Arginine imbalance in this case may cause lower laying rate.

 

Egg quality

Egg quality parameters such as yolk color, shape index, yolk index, haugh unit, albumin percentage, and shell thickness are mostly not affected by Arg level (Youssef et al., 2015). Lima & Silva (2007) also did not observe any effect of different digestible Arg to Lys ratios on egg quality parameters. Silva et al. (2012) observed a linear increase in egg weight with a higher Arg level although it brought in an opposite effect on specific egg gravity (Basiouni et al., 2006). Yang et al. (2015) supplemented 0, 8.5 and 17.0 mg L-Arg per kg of feed in 25-week-old brown leghorn hens. L-Arg had no negative effects of egg production and egg quality. Yolk color was evaluated with DSM yolk color fan (expressed in 15 grades). Yolk color was increased in group 17.0 mg L-Arg per kg of feed compared to control group. In general, the effects of Arg on egg quality looks limited.

 

 

Immunity

L-Arg has direct and indirect influence on immunity. In Leghorn type chickens, 30% L-Arg above NRC recommendations caused an increase in anti-sheep red blood cell (anti-SRBC) antibody level and a reduction in relative bursa weight in high Arg fed birds. Short-term supplementary L-Arg had minimal effects on immunity, but some enhancement of SRBC antibody responses in later stages of growth was observed with previous L-Arg administration (Deng et al., 2005). Supplementing L-Arg in laying hens significantly increased WBC and lymphocyte cells while significantly decreased the percentages of heterophils and the ratio of heterophils to lymphocyte in comparison to the control group (Youssef et al., 2015; Al-Hassani et al., 2011).

In breeder hens, 1.36% dArg significantly elevated total antioxidative capacity of birds and reduced the malondialdehyde (MDA) concentration in all tissues. Higher L-Arg levels was disadvantageous (Duan et al., 2015) showing the important of Arg balance to enhance antioxidant capacity via nonenzymatic and enzymatic antioxidant systems. A decrease in serum MDA content suggest that Arg may protect tissues against lipid oxidation especially in the cell walls.

IgY content in eggs was 62.8% higher and IL-2 was 41.8% higher when 17mg L-Arg per kg of feed was supplemented to birds comparing to control birds not receiving supplemental L-Arg (table 1; Yang et al., 2015).

Table 1. Effect of L-arginine on immune parameters of eggs

 

Conclusion

Based on the literature study, CJ has established the ideal amino acids ratio for the laying hens. The ideal Arg to Lys in pre-lay period is found in the range of 106-115% and for the laying period is 112%. Beneficial effects of Arg beyond performance should be taken into consideration as well. Immune status of layers can be improved by supplementing Arg above the requirements.

개인정보처리방침

개인정보의 자동 수집 장치·운영·거부사항

고객님의 정보를 수시로 저장하고 찾아내는 ‘쿠키(cookie)’를 운용합니다. 쿠키란 씨제이제일제당(주)의 웹사이트를 운영하는데 이용되는 서버가 고객님의 브라우저(인터넷 익스플로러 등)에 보내는 아주 작은 텍스트 데이터로서 고객님이 사이트에 로그온 한 상태에서 고객님을 인증하기 위해 사용되고 있습니다. 쿠키는 고객님의 컴퓨터는 식별하지만 고객님을 개인적으로 식별하지는 않습니다. 또한 고객님은 쿠키에 대한 선택권이 있습니다.

웹 브라우저 상단의 도구 > 인터넷 옵션 탭(option tab)에서 모든 쿠키를 다 받아들이거나, 쿠키가 설치될 때 통지를 보내도록 하거나, 아니면 모든 쿠키를 거부할 수 있는 선택권을 가질 수 있습니다. 고객님이 쿠키를 거부하겠다고 선택하는 경우 사용자 등록을 요하는 서버의 서비스는 이용할 수 없음을 감안하시기 바랍니다.

씨제이제일제당(주)는 다음과 같은 목적을 위해 쿠키를 사용합니다.

  • 접속 빈도나 방문 시간 등을 분석하고 고객님의 취향과 관심 분야를 파악하여 타겟(target) 마케팅 및 서비스 개편 등의 척도로 활용합니다.

※ 서비스 이용 과정에서 생성/수집되는 정보

수집 항목 이용 목적
서비스 이용 기록, 접속로그, 접속IP, 단말접속 일시, PUSH토큰 개인정보 침해 사고에 대한 대비, 분쟁 조정을 위한 기록보존, 서비스 혜택 안내

※ 모바일 서비스 이용 과정에서 생성/수집되는 정보

구분 접근항목 접근목적
모바일 앱
접근권한
필수 기기정보 및 앱 기록권한 앱 서비스 최적화, 오류확인,
서비스 분석 및 통계
선택 iOS 사진 미디어, 카메라 접근 권한
생체정보(안면, 지문) 접근 권한
위치 접근 권한
앱 서비스 제공 및 최적화
안드로이드 주소록 접근 권한
사진 미디어, 카메라 접근 권한
생체정보(지문, 안면) 접근 권한
위치 접근 권한

개인정보보호책임자 이름 및 부서·연락처

고객님의 개인정보를 보호하고 개인정보와 관련한 불만을 처리하기 위하여 씨제이제일제당(주)는 개인정보보호책임자를 두고 있습니다. 개인정보와 관련한 문의 사항이 있으시면 아래의 개인정보보호책임자에게 연락 주시기 바랍니다. 고객님의 문의 사항에 신속하고 성실하게 답변해드리겠습니다.

부서 이름 전화번호 이메일
FNT 마케팅전략)
브랜드마케팅팀
김고은 02-6740-3430 cjbiobrand@cj.net
(평일 오전 9~12시, 오후 1시~5시 30분)

개인정보 침해 관련 상담 및 신고

개인정보침해에 대한 신고나 상담이 필요하신 경우, 다음의 관련 기관으로 문의하여 도움을 받으실 수 있습니다.

개인정보침해신고센터 개인정보분쟁조정위원회 대검찰청사이버수사과 경찰청 사이버안전국
(국번없이) 118
privacy.kisa.or.kr
1833-6972
www.kopico.go.kr
(국번없이) 1301
www.spo.go.kr
(국번없이) 182
cyberbureau.police.go.kr

본 개인정보 처리방침은 법령, 정책 또는 보안기술의 변경에 따라 그 내용이 변경될 수 있으며, 내용의 추가 및 삭제, 수정이 있을 시에는 제일제당 인터넷사이트를 통해 이유 및 변경내용을 공지하도록 하겠습니다.

  • 개인정보처리방침 수정일자 : 2023-03-20